The only effect of issuing government bonds is to support non-zero interest rates. The word zero in this entry is an adjective. The meaning of non-zero should then be intuitive; or, as Lewis Carroll would say, if you understand the term “zero chance,” then you have to understand “non-zero chance.” Energy sources and mineral wealth, as well as the “toxic waste” produced by our systems, the disappearance of aquifers, transmission lines (e.g., the opening of the Northwest Passage) are all crucial to who wins and who loses – and we would like to note here that the only sustainable solution is a win-win situation other than zero. A “non-zero” probability simply expresses that there is a positive probability. Economy, uncertainty and European football: trends in competitive equilibrium “For CB, every competitor in a game really has to have a no zero) to win.” This would be a non-zero chance, which would also upset their entire strategy to get a law signed! Literally, a non-zero chance means that something can happen. It`s actually used in different ways, and you need to differentiate yourself from the context. And sometimes it`s not entirely clear in your examples: a “non-zero” chance, on the other hand, is often used to describe something that has such a low probability of occurrence that it might as well be “zero chance.” The oft-quoted “1,000 monkeys hitting 1,000 typewriters spontaneously typing the complete works of William Shakespeare” is an example – it`s not impossible, but it`s mathematically guaranteed that it will (probably) never happen. Having more than you actually need is a good thing and allows you to rebuild the fund from scratch once you`re back at work. “Here`s a pretty incredible fact: There`s no chance Donald Trump won`t pay taxes,” Clinton tweeted just minutes after releasing her own statements. Time August 11, 2016 Therefore, it is important to check with your local Social Security office as soon as possible to see if you are doing quality for a non-zero excess spouse`s benefit. Forbes Jan 2015 Well, the misunderstanding between the PO and its interlocutor had another layer that was placed on it. The term non-zero chance, like the most mundane term possible, covers a wide range by its meaning, probabilities, which are only a burst above zero, to one. However, it would be strange and misleading (but not wrong) to use any of these terms if one knew that the probability is very high.

While these terms logically do not imply that the probability is low, they do imply it (in the vague and everyday sense of involving) or involve or imply it. In other words, they convey the idea that probability is pragmatically low, but not semantically. There is no chance that such use of resources will not even justify the people on the ground – or nearby. As far as we know, electrons are stable, with an immutable non-zero mass. The author is technically right – others have already pointed out that “non-zero” is not a double negative. In a purely technical (and somewhat pedantic) sense, a “zero-free” chance is different from a “small chance.” A “small chance” means that there is still a chance that something will happen at some point. For example, there`s a small chance the Mars rover will find evidence of life on the Red Planet tomorrow — it`s not particularly likely to happen, but there`s a mathematically reasonable probability. Even for “OC” it is a non-zero market, and “OC” is a monopoly.

Now, the same division can be seen when people talk about probabilities. The everyday framework of their conceptualization has concepts such as impossible, possible (but unlikely), probable (probably), sure. The differences between these appear to be qualitative at first glance and are designated as such. However, people trained to quantitatively analyze probabilities think of them as a continuum between zero and one. In this framework, something that is impossible has the probability of zero, something that is certain has the probability of one, and everything that is possible but not certain has a probability that lies between these extremes. A person accustomed to this setting may feel the need to use the term “non-zero probability” or “non-zero chance” to make it clear that not everything we are talking about is impossible. To a person who is not used to it, such a sentence seems strange, just like the non-zero speed in the example above. (By the way, to answer directly the question posed in the title, yes, no zero in this context means more than zero, since the probability scale does not fall below zero.) Consider, for example, the difference between motion and stop. For many people, this is probably a qualitative, clear and unambiguous difference.

Such people may talk about moving things as if they had this or that speed, but would never talk about the speed of a stationary object. A scientifically trained person, on the other hand, finds it quite natural to say that such an object has zero speed. In the conceptual framework of such a person, the difference between movement and stop is purely quantitative; This is the difference between zero speed and another speed. A person who is used to this way of thinking may feel compelled when talking about things that are actually moving to say that he has a non-zero speed; For humans, on the other hand, “non-zero” seems superfluous in such a context, since they would never apply the concept of speed to immobile things.